Voriconazole
Summary
Persistence. It cannot be excluded that voriconazole is persistent, due to lack of data.
Bioaccumulation. It cannot be excluded that voriconazole bioaccumulates, due to lack of data.
Toxicity. It cannot be excluded that voriconazole is toxic, due to lack of data.
Risk. Risk of environmental impact of voriconazole cannot be excluded, due to the lack of environmental toxicity data.
Environmental information for voriconazole is missing on fass.se (2026-06-16).
Detailed information
General information about assessment reports
Since 2006, an Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) for the active pharmaceutical substance shall accompany an application for a marketing authorisation in EU for a medicinal product for human use. Parts of environmental data are available in the public assessment report (PAR/EPAR for centrally approved medicines). Environmental considerations are not included in the benefit-risk assessment for human medicines. If new data emerge after approval that necessitate an update of the environmental risk assessment, a variation application (“type IB C.I.z variation”) must be submitted to the regulatory authority.
The PEC (predicted environmental concentration) values used to calculate risk in the manufacturers' assessment reports are based on the estimated use of the medicinal product to which the assessment report relates, as well as possibly other products from the same company, not all medicinal products containing the same active substance.
Assessment report Vfend
Assessment report for Vfend (voriconazole), type II variation for a new indication, 22 May 2014, EMA/CHMP/379202/2014.
"During the assessment procedure, in compliance with the “Guideline on the Environmental Risk Assessment of Medicinal Products for Human Use” (EMEA/CHMP/ SWP/4447/00, June 2006), an updated Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) has been provided as requested. It concluded that voriconazole does not meet the criteria for classification as a Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity (PBT) compound. Based on the Phase II Tier A analysis, no environmentally related labels are required for voriconazole. Disposal of unused medicines should follow local guidelines and requirements." No data have been presented.
Assessment report for generics containing voriconazole
There are two generics with assessment reports available on the EMA website containing similar information. The most recent one presented here concerns Voriconazole Hospira, 26 March 2015, EMA/CHMP/151531/2015.
No environmental risk assessment (ERA) was submitted, which was considered acceptable for a generic application based on the applicant’s justification. The introduction of Voriconazole Hospira is not expected to increase overall use or environmental exposure, and therefore no increased environmental risk is anticipated. The CHMP accepted this justification.
Comment on generics
After the implementation of the latest European Medicines Agency (EMA) ERA guideline (1 September 2024), a generic company has the following options for Article 10 procedures under Directive 2001/83/EC:
i) to argue that a full ERA is not required because the pharmaceutical substance belongs to certain substance groups (e.g., so-called natural substances);
ii) to identify an official ERA from a previously accepted product and use it; or
iii) to develop its own ERA according to the latest EMA ERA guideline.
Arguments for not submitting an Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) based on the claim that total environmental exposure has not increased (via total sales volumes) belong to the previous ERA guideline system (2006–2024) and are no longer applicable. Regarding option ii), it should be noted that if a reference ERA exists, the generic company must demonstrate that its conclusions remain technically relevant (since the latest ERA guideline introduced several new technical requirements absent in the previous ERA guideline) and in terms of exposure (showing that the estimated exposure used in the reference ERA remains reasonable). Regulatory authorities (national and EMA) recommend that generic companies attempt to obtain reference ERA documentation from other companies via a so-called Letter of Access (LoA). However, if this is not possible, it remains feasible to argue that the conclusions of an existing reference ERA are still relevant based on information gathered from public assessment reports (summarized descriptions of environmental risk assessments) and product information (to confirm that dosages, indications, etc., have not changed). It should be noted that in some cases, reference ERAs approved between 2006 and 2024 may need to be modified (e.g., with additional experimental studies). If no previous reference ERA can be identified or used, the generic company must commit to developing its own ERA.
Author: Health and Medical Care Administration, Region Stockholm
